Lights at the End of the Tunnel. Of Moon Shots and Medicine.

As I glanced through the obituaries the other day (yes, I have reached that stage in my life) I noticed a death notice with funeral arrangements for an oncologist I worked with twenty years ago. Of course I was saddened to hear of his passing, but what immediately came to mind was a conversation with a different oncologist that I overheard a long, long time ago–1976, to be precise.

It was the very beginning of my 2nd year at the University of Illinois School of Medicine. M1 Year had been spent buried in textbooks and anatomy lab, but with the onset of M2 Year, our class had (very limited) entre into the clinical world.

We were placed in groups of four, and each week every group had a pair of three-hour sessions in a clinician’s office. My group’s assigned physician was a busy oncologist who tolerated our being in his office but didn’t let us do much with his patients, and didn’t offer much insight either. But at least we got the vibe of being in the same general vicinity as living, breathing, patients.

At the end of one Tuesday session, our oncologist told us not to show up for that week’s Thursday session, as the office would be closed while he attended a funeral.

“Do you go to all your patient’s funerals?” the boldest of our foursome of M2s asked.

“I don’t go to ANY of them,” was the rather brusque reply.

A couple of that oncologist’s attitudes were transmitted to us in that brief exchange. “First,” he was conveying to us, “as a physician, you must keep your distance from your patients. Medicine is your occupation, maybe even your passion, but the patients are not your friends.”

“Second,” he seemed to be saying “I am an oncologist. All my patients die.”

As I said, that was a long, long time ago. I followed my talents to a medical field where I have so little patient contact that there is little risk of patients becoming my friends. Instead many of my friends have become my “patients”, the downside of being a 60-something prostate pathologist with a cadre of friends my own age.

But more importantly, oncologists no longer need to feel that their patients will die from their disease. Tumor screening (colonoscopy, mammography), leading to early cancer diagnosis, the use of genetic evaluation of tumors to guide therapy, the fantastic advances in understanding tumor immunology-these are wondrous tools that have made many cancers curable or converted them to chronic, treatable, conditions rather than rapidly lethal nightmares.

We aren’t at cancer nirvana yet. Treatments are still too expensive, life-style factors still put patients at risk. Some malignancies still baffle the best experts.

But perhaps in my lifetime, the Cancer Moonshot will succeed. And when an oncologist says “I don’t go to cancer patient’s funerals” it will be because there are none.


Like what you read here? Add your name to our subscription list below. No spam, I promise! ___

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Address *
First Name
Last Name
//s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.mailchimp.com/js/mc-validate.js(function($) {window.fnames = new Array(); window.ftypes = new Array();fnames[0]=’EMAIL’;ftypes[0]=’email’;fnames[1]=’FNAME’;ftypes[1]=’text’;fnames[2]=’LNAME’;ftypes[2]=’text’;}(jQuery));var $mcj = jQuery.noConflict(true); ———————————–

Running Mates and Other Mates: Fighting Trump, Fighting Cancer

carly fiorinaGirl, I heard you’re getting married,

Heard your getting married,

This time you’re really sure.

Brooklyn Bridge-1969

Ted Cruz keeps looking for a partner. First we have the sort of/maybe/not really deal with John Kasich, trying to not cut each others throats in the remaining primaries. Quickly followed by yesterday’s announcement of Carly Fiorina as his Vice Presidential running mate, and vocal coach as well. All of this, of course, in an effort to stymie Donald Trump in his march to the Republican Presidential nomination. It appears that Cruz’s philosophy is that if you can’t win on your own, grab your partner or partners and do-si-do.

I don’t know how well the pairing technique is going to work in politics, but a new study reported in the journal Cancer and summarized in the Chicago Tribune suggests that married patients do better in their fight against cancer than comparable single people. The advantage is greater for men than women, and is not associated with socio-economic status. It seems that hand holding, cooking, chaffeuring and all around loving can help survival. No surprises there, right? But it brings to mind a former colleague of mine, one of the most talented men that I have had the pleasure to have known and work with. Let’s call him John, and his wife Mary About 18 months ago John was given the diagnosis of advanced lung cancer. He has undergone surgery, traditional chemotherapy, and novel treatments as a patient in advanced clinical trials. During all this John has maintained his active lifestyle and achieved new professional goals and accomplishments. He has documented his battle in a wonderful blog (the blog is not public, I cannot share a link) that both faces the difficult realities and celebrates all the wonderful triumphs. And as he freely admits, it is the love, care and support of the magnificent Mary, now aptly nicknamed Chemo-sa-babe, that makes it all possible. I know that as I experience John’s life on his blog, Mary is there holding his hand for every battle won and for every set-back. And as the study in Cancer suggests, that hand holding may be the reason the wins so greatly outnumber the backslides.

Cancer has also visited our family; fortunately it did not stay. I hope I did enough to support Barb four years ago, though I think it may have been the prospect of Michael and Becca’s wedding that hastened her recovery. I hope neither one of us becomes the supporter or the supportee in the future.

And as for Ted Cruz, does it matter how many partners he takes? He will continue to be Ted Cruz, and that doesn’t seem to be the man the rest of America wants to marry!

Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

 

5 Things Your Pathologist Never Told You

 

Robert PalmerDoctor, doctor…

…give me the news.

Robert Palmer-1979

We have been called “The Doctor’s Doctor.” Pathologists stood in the background for decades, running laboratories, interpreting biopsies, staging tumors and making diagnoses. We rarely exposed ourselves directly to patients. There is even a law in New York State that explicitly prevents such contact. But now we live in a much more connected world. At the dawn of the digital age I created Pathwise, a company that “translated” biopsy reports from medical jargon to easy to understand English for patients with a desire to know. Now pathologists communicate via the Web, via Facebook, via Twitter. But even with all this improved interaction, there are still things you may not know about what really happens to your blood or your kidney or breast once it exits your doctor’s office, your hospital bed,  the O.R. And even less that you might know about the pathologist who coordinates all the activity.

  1. Most likely, the laboratory that analyzes your specimens has a pathologist as a Medical Director. To have an accredited laboratory, there is a long list of obligations and requirements that the Medical Director must ensure are occurring. This does NOT include running every blood test or making every slide personally. It DOES include verifying that qualified, well trained personnel are on hand to perform those tasks. And the scrutiny we are under to guarantee that keeps on growing.
  2. Pathologists deal with our own version of Moore’s Law. In computing, Moore’s Law predicts that over time, denser and more powerful integrated circuits will be developed. In pathology, we are faced with the proposition that tissue samples are getting smaller and smaller, but the amount of information we need to derive from them is getting greater and greater. In the last decade, tests looking at cancer cells for the various changes in their genes–how these cells differ from normal cells–are becoming essential in determining the precise type of tumor in a biopsy, as well as in deciding what chemo- or immunotherapy treatments will work best for a particular patient. And by the way, those tests are not cheap.
  3. The concept that there is a sharp line that separates “benign” from “malignant” can be a false one. Yes, in the vast majority of cases I can unequivocally call a biopsy benign or malignant. But that border line can be fuzzy; there can be a gray zone. Sometimes we just cannot accurately predict how a tumor will behave. And it is not just us local diagnosticians who are in this quandry. National experts don’t always agree on the nature of what they see under their microscope. And it can be a moving target. As new techniques are developed, and as our knowledge of the molecular underpinnings of illness grow, our interpretations and naming of disease processes change as well.
  4. You may be surprised to see a bill from a lab halfway across the country. Not all of your blood tests or tissue tests are performed locally. Some large national laboratories operate central hubs which may handle all specimens from a wide geographic area. Some more esoteric tests, particularly molecular and genetic studies on tumors, may only be performed at one laboratory in the country. Laws relating to patenting of genetic testing have changed, but laboratories can still create test combinations that are difficult to duplicate elsewhere.
  5. Pathologists are frequently leaders in a Medical Center. With offices and laboratories in the hospital, the pathologist often spends more time in the building than their clinical colleagues. This, combined with a general sense of trustworthiness, lead to many roles both within the administration of the hospital and the concerns of the physicians that make up the medical staff.

One more thing. Most pathologists love their job!

Want to keep on top of things? Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.